A Work in Progress: The Importance of Peer Feedback in the Writing Process

When I discovered that this course involved writing for publication, I felt a surge of excitement. I have a strong desire to create something impactful that enhances the field I work in and provides better support for teachers and students. Although I initially questioned my expertise, my years of teaching and ongoing graduate studies have equipped me with valuable insights that can significantly benefit fellow educators. I am enthusiastic about sharing these experiences and strategies, with the goal of making their professional lives more rewarding and effective.
Considering these factors, I decided to focus my publication on the integration of Blended Learning in a new teacher academy. As I developed my publication outline, it became increasingly clear how much the blended learning approach could benefit both our teachers' professional learning experiences and student learning. By empowering our teachers to collaborate through this method and obtain feedback, we can equip them with the skills they need to be successful.

Peer Assessment

To ensure a consistent and fair evaluation process, our group developed a peer assessment rubric that outlined the criteria for assessing our publications. After reviewing the elements needed for our rough draft, we decided to categorize them into three main areas: the article's formatting, the explanation of the topic, and the incorporation of digital tools. We used these categories to create a rubric and assigned point values to each required element for the rough draft publication. By structuring our rubric this way, we can clearly identify which areas need improvement based on the scores we receive from each other.

We utilized detailed rubrics to evaluate each other's work, carefully assessing various aspects of the assignments. After the scoring process, we provided constructive feedback directly within the papers, highlighting areas that required improvement or revision. This collaborative approach allowed us to support one another in enhancing our writing skills and producing higher-quality work.

My Score and Reflection

As I reviewed my rough draft and the feedback from my peers, I realized that I overlooked including the submission guidelines for my article. Laura Khan, Joseline Sanchez, and Jahir Tamayo all offered constructive feedback on how to restructure my conclusion. This peer editing process has been invaluable in helping me strengthen my writing and stay focused on my goals.

Overall, the peer review process has provided me with a fresh perspective on my work and motivated me to make significant improvements. I am excited to finalize my publication and submit it to the selected outlets.

My overall score: 47/50
​

Below is the rough draft with revisions from peer feedback

Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.